Google
 

Re: Measuring the Branding Impact of Online Ads

From: Ivan Weltman <ivan_at_tudogs.com>
Date: Wed 19 Dec 2001 10:40:54 -0500

Arun Natarajan <arun_natarajan_at_vsnl.com> wrote:

>It seems that Measurability is a very important factor
>in this issue: while click-thrus are easy and objectively
>measurable, there's no easy--and universally acceptable--
>way for advertisers to measure the branding impact of
>online ads. As a result, advertisers tend to rely on
>click-thrus to evaluate effectiveness of all online
>advertising.
>
>Though most of us acknowledge that this situation is not
>v.desirable--for publishers, at least ;-)--the problem so
>far, has been the TINA ("There Is No Alternative") factor...
>
>I recently came across two firms proposing different
>approaches to solving this problem: one from research
>firm, Jupiter Media Metrix and another by AdIndex (a
>division of Dynamic Logic)
>
>* The JMM Approach
>
>The relevant JMM report is titled "Is the CPM Model Dead?:
>Making Pay-for-Performance a Sustainable Media Buying
>Model for Advertisers and Publishers". I'm extracting
>a couple of paras from the report beloew to highlight
>their proposed "hybrid CPM-CPA model" solution

This is no solution at all.

>* The AdIndex Approach
>
>According to the site (www.adindexnetwork.com), AdIndex
>is a tool that "aims to provide attitudinal metrics to
>online media campaigns and help advertisers measure the
>impact of ALL their impressions - not just those that
>were clicked".
>
>AdIndex uses online surveys to gather data from visitors
>to the participating web sites. Visitors are randomly
>intercepted to take a brief survey and, upon their
>consent are asked a series of questions designed to
>measure the communications impact of a campaign.

Better than nothing, but still inadequate.

My suggestion is that tightly controlled experimental
designs be used in selected markets in which exposure
from a range of media can be confined. The research
design should measure pre/post increment in awareness
and attitude. Media can then be meaningfully compared
in terms of cost of achieving goals. Media could be:
Local TV; Newspapers; Radio; Opt-in email;
Online Banners, Text Ads, Pop-ups and pop-unders.

An experimental design eliminates the effect of all
variables except the one(s) being measured.

Frankly I'm surprised that big ad spenders like P&G haven't
done this already!

Ivan Weltman
http://www.tudogs.com





Received on Wed Dec 19 2001 - 09:40:54 CST


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Local SEO with Video
Houston SEO
Houston Web Design

Add your company...

Local SEO with Video
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.