Google
 

So will you DO something about it?

From: Alex Tillman <alex_at_webtillman.com>
Date: Mon 04 Feb 2002 10:34:44 -0500

Jason Geraci <jasong_at_streamcast.ws> wrote:

>I just feel that there are a lot of SUSPECT
>advertisers out there that are looking to use and
>reuse anyone who gets in their way. In my opinion it
>isn't the publishers who need to prove something, it
>is the advertisers. Period. They need to build some
>credibility with the publisher world not vice versa.

So, the person shelling out the dollars and purchasing
a service has to "prove" anything to the person
selling it? That makes no sense whatsoever. If you
want their money, you have to step up to the plate.

I see a lot of comments here that sound eerily like GM
and Chrysler back in the 80's. They spent so much time
trying to explain why consumers really did need their
cars (and slamming the imports for "giving away the
business") that they failed to recognize that the
consumer had already indicated, in no uncertain terms,
its preference. Business would simply have to adapt.

Maybe CPM really can work for both parties. Then stop
carping about it, write up some credible case study
examples, and line up some glowing references (ones
that will actually say something positive when
speaking to another potential advertiser), and you'll
sell out your ad inventory. But all this crying about
how evil advertisers are soulless, mindless, robots,
seeking to destroy the online publishing business is a
bad joke. Just as a publisher doesn't want to produce
a product that can't even pay it's own bills, an
advertiser can't afford to waste money on something
that isn't ultimately driving sales. Both sides just
want a fair return on their investment.

Businesses will pay for something that works. So there
can be only two options if the industry won't yet pay
profitable prices for CPM ads. Either they don't work,
or publishers cannot effectively demonstrate that they
do. If it's the first, your model is doomed. If it's
the latter, much more energy should be spent creating
better ways of documenting success.

Bottom line: It is officially put up or shut up time
for the online publishing industry. Either take the
time to demonstrate that your current model actually
does work, or start looking for a new one. (Or a new
line of business.) And all this complaining about
ruthless advertisers only helps undermine your case.
When the domestic automible industry finally stopped
blaming "uneducated" consumers and started actually
listening to them, it finally stopped the free-fall
and began climbing back.




Received on Mon Feb 04 2002 - 09:34:44 CST


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Clicksor
List and Found
AdJungle
The Laredo Group

Add your company...

Laredo Group Interactive Advertising Training
AdJungle
List and Found
Clicksor
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.

Visit our other web sites:
Tennis Server | Tennis Server Ticket Exchange | MyCityRocks | MyCityRocks Ticket Exchange