Re: Spam Cop

From: Jim Reardon <jim_at_amusive.com>
Date: Thu 27 Mar 2003 07:48:32 -0600

Melinda Robinson wrote:

>Excuse me for saying this, but even spammers have families to
>support. Even they have to eat and pay rent. Sometimes, it
>comes down to something as unappealing as spamming. Had it
>meant that I would have been able to make enough money to
>avoid my family becoming homeless early last year, I would
>have spammed anyone and everyone. Spam can be deleted and can
>even alert people to new products or services that they may
>indeed be interested in (if you carefully qualify your
>recipients). Starving, homeless children... well, there's
>not a whole lot you can do about that.

This is pathetic. Do you defend petty thugs, thieves, and
muggers in such a manner? No. Yet spammers steal from people
on a daily basis in the same manner. Your post is a horrid,
invalid comparison and is truly disgusting.

                              ---
Jim Reardon <jim_at_amusive.com>
http://www.amusive.com/




Received on Thu Mar 27 2003 - 07:48:32 CST