Re: Spam Cop

From: Jim Reardon <jim_at_amusive.com>
Date: Mon 31 Mar 2003 08:29:31 -0600

On Fri 28 Mar 2003 16:13:33 -0600, Jim Sterne wrote:
>Jim's flame was a bit harsh but Cliff, I think you
>made the right choice to post it. I had a very strong
>emotional reaction to her post as well and realized
>I shouldn't express myself immediately.

While I agree with you -- my post should have went through (okay, I'm
a little biased!) -- I have to disagree that it was a 'flame'. I did
not insult nor attack the person asking the question, I merely
pointed out the fact that her marketing tactics were, in my opinion,
bad.

The subject of spam comes up often here, I've expressed complete
arguments and explanations as to why spam amounts to theft. I did
not recount my entire argument in that email, perhaps next time I
will.
---
Jim Reardon <jim_at_amusive.com>
http://www.amusive.com/






Received on Mon Mar 31 2003 - 08:29:31 CST