Re: Junk email or quality information?

Uni-T (Homer_at_freebairn.com)
Fri, 5 Jul 1996 23:56:09 -0400

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Archive Home Page
• Search
• Next message: CottonwdSW_at_aol.com: "Re: Junk email or quality information?"
• Previous message: Uni-T: "Re: Junk email or quality information?"
• Maybe in reply to: Steve Glover: "Junk email or quality information?"
• Next in thread: CottonwdSW_at_aol.com: "Re: Junk email or quality information?"

> A third problem is more subjective....

Hear Hear!!!!!!

The realistic problem that advertising faces is entirely subjective... one
can say that a direct mail response that generates 3% is good, one that
generates 10% is great.... the real *hope* that I see in the internet is
in it's ability to address the needs of the other 90 or so percent...

Now if we can just hire a customer service rep for each person on the
internet, we'll be just fine :)

Best Regards,

Steve Glover

• Archive Home Page
• Search
• Next message: CottonwdSW_at_aol.com: "Re: Junk email or quality information?"
• Previous message: Uni-T: "Re: Junk email or quality information?"
• Maybe in reply to: Steve Glover: "Junk email or quality information?"
• Next in thread: CottonwdSW_at_aol.com: "Re: Junk email or quality information?"

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.