Re: email or quality information?

Tara Calishain (calumet_at_ral.mindspring.com)
Sun, 07 Jul 1996 13:03:48 -0400

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Archive Home Page
• Search
• Next message: Peter Hartley: "Re: email or quality information?"
• Previous message: Arkie Koehl: "Spam 'n Ethics"
• Maybe in reply to: S. Finer: "email or quality information?"
• Next in thread: Peter Hartley: "Re: email or quality information?"

At 07:16 AM 7/7/96 -0400, you wrote:
>
> Please can we kill this thread now?

No no no! Wait ! I have a POINT!

There are some arguments to be made that it "doesn't take up
much time" and so forth to send out bulk e-mail NOW... but right
NOW, e-mail is only ASCII. That is RAPIDLY changing. There are
attachments you can put on Eudora in order to send voice messages,
and I believe there are similar things available on AOL. Will bulk
e-mailers be able to explain away their marketing techniques when
the average e-mail message is 200-300K instead of 2-3K?

Tara

• Archive Home Page
• Search
• Next message: Peter Hartley: "Re: email or quality information?"
• Previous message: Arkie Koehl: "Spam 'n Ethics"
• Maybe in reply to: S. Finer: "email or quality information?"
• Next in thread: Peter Hartley: "Re: email or quality information?"

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.