Google
 

NONE: Re: ONLINE-ADS>> Cookie crumbs

Re: ONLINE-ADS>> Cookie crumbs

Chris Tyler (chris_at_woodstock.global.proximity.on.ca)
Tue, 10 Jun 1997 09:28:44 -0400

Denman Maroney <denman_at_pipeline.com> wrote:
>
> The article by Whit Andrews in Webweek, to which your AdBytes newsletter
> provided a link, says in part,
>
> "Cookies, a system through which individual users may be uniquely identified
> by Web sites, initially were touted as accessible only by the Web sites that
> issued them. The passage of time showed that networks of objects on
> disparate Web sites could access the same cookie, a technical loophole that
> ad servers exploit to improve ad targeting. "
>
> I never heard this before. Is it true?

Yes (and no)...

(1) It is true that it is only possible to send cookies back to the domain or
host on which they came (at least, when the cookie mechanism complies with the
original spec from Netscape). The default is the exact host from which the
request originates; this can be changed to the second- or third-level domain
(or lower) through the Set-cookie: request header.

The problem is that a web page is a composite of information from various URLs;
thus images on a site can be from a different domain than the page text. This
is how banner servers (such Doubleclick) work. (I'll pick on Doubleclick here
because they are using tracking in some of the most useful and interesting
ways).

Thus, if you visit 20 different sites which all serve Doubleclick banners, and
Doubleclick sets a cookie when you visit the first site, then they are capable
of tracking your surfing between those 20 different sites. This is because you
keep retrieving information *from the same domain* (Doubleclick's) despite the
fact that you are "visiting" different domains. Doubleclick actually considers
this a Good Thing(tm) because they can avoid sending more than N impressions to
a given browser, and they can sequence ads seen by a particular browser-- e.g.,
do a Letterman-style "Top 10 Reasons", or send a riddle followed by the answer,
even across multiple sites.

(2) It is difficult to have a banner server communicate this tracking
information back to the site serving the pages containing the banner; about the
only way that this cross-reference can be performed is if (i) the site with the
main content sets a cookie also, and then (ii) sends that cookie to the banner
server by modifying the arguments to the query string in the URL of the banner
request, e.g., using an image tag something like <IMG
SRC="BannerServer.BannerCompany.com?CallingURL=http://thisPage&CookieThatThisSit
eSet=cookievalue">
... this then requires the image tag to be CGI-generated and the two companies
to later sit down and cross-reference their log files.

Possible, yes; easy, so-so; worthwhile, probably not.

Personally, I think that it's a Win for me that banner companies can track me.
I *do* like ad-sponsored content (I hate to shell out $ for content) so I'm
glad to "put up" with ads; but I'd rather have interesting ads-- so if cookies
can limit the number of impressions of each ad that I see, then I'm pleased.
Likewise, if Doubleclick can determine that I'm surfing from Canada based on my
IP address (they can and do) and therefore serve me ads for services and
products available in Canada, in Canadian dollars, then I'm that much happier.

Note also that most banner systems resort to guessing (about tracking) based on
your IP address if you don't accept cookies. Most of the time, these guesses
are accurate, but only within the same call to your ISP.

A good, simple technical reference on cookies is available on the Netscape site
(http://www.netscape.com/newsref/std/cookie_spec.html); it's marked
'Preliminary' but serves as the canonical reference. Note that many versions of
Netscape accept only the first "Set-cookie:" header in a http response, despite
what the document says.

I recently hosted the Woodstock Business Internet Conference and was fascinated
that there were many, many questions about cookies. The level of fear about
cookies and privacy was quite high, perhaps due to the popular press.

--
Chris Tyler                       <Chris_at_Global.Proximity.ON.CA>
Global Proximity Corporation      http://Global.Proximity.ON.CA/
Internet and Computer Consulting  (519) 421-3541 / fax (519) 421-2107
*** Organizers of the Woodstock Business Internet Conference ***


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Clicksor
List and Found
AdJungle
The Laredo Group

Add your company...

Laredo Group Interactive Advertising Training
AdJungle
List and Found
Clicksor
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.

Visit our other web sites:
Tennis Server | Tennis Server Ticket Exchange | MyCityRocks | MyCityRocks Ticket Exchange