Google
 

NONE: Re: ONLINE-ADS>> Value of Test Banners?

Re: ONLINE-ADS>> Value of Test Banners?

Ali Partovi (apartovi_at_linkexchange.com)
Mon, 13 Oct 1997 15:30:53 -0700

Mike Pooler <pooler_at_pcgame.com> wrote:

>From my perspective, it makes total sense to offer test banners to
>potential advertisers... Our competitors have bigger names than us,
>and we sometimes think that advertisers would rather rush like
>lemmings to them, rather than taking the time to evaluate something
>slightly smaller, but of demonstrably higher value. A test run is a
>great way to go.

This may be a good way to get a one-time jumpstart on ad sales,
especially for "slightly smaller" players (though I wouldn't call
pcgame.com "small" ! ).

A better long-term strategy is, don't give away "freebies," but if you
do, use them to reward your most loyal customers, rather than to woo
away other people's customers. New customers acquired via freebies or
discounts may expect discounts for the whole ride.

>> Mark J. Welch, Esq.,markwelch_at_ca-probate.com wrote on 10/10/97 9:57 AM:
>>
>> >I will jump in and disagree. Glen suggested testing a "statistically
>> >significant" number of banners with 2 or 3 different creatives. At
>> >Web Advertising '97, Ali Partovi (of LinkExchange) suggested
>> >that measuring the response rate for a particular banner and
>> >comparing it to other creatives isn't reliable until about 100,000
>> >adviews for each banner

A number of people have asked about my recent talk at the Web
Advertising '97 conference. In reality, anywhere from 25,000 -
100,000 adviews per banner may suffice, depending on the accuracy
desired. As Mark has shown, we tend to be extra careful with accurate
measurements at LinkExchange.

I should stress that click-thru is a poor measure of performance.
Enticing or deceptive banners have high click-through rates, but may
result in frustrated visitors who leave your site. A finely-targeted
banner may actually have a lower click-through rate, but results in
more valuable visitors. It's often more effective to use banners for
branding (after all, 95%- 99% of your money is spent on the viewers
who didn't click!). This is the strategy we use at LinkExchange to
advertise our own service, though it always results in low
click-through rates.

This is bad news for advertisers who expect a utopia of perfect but
easy results- based measurement. Even "per-inquiry" or "per-sale"
measurements are inadequate, unless you can track people who return to
your site later, or who refer a friend. Nevertheless, many
LinkExchange advertisers have found that their campaigns resulted
directly in online sales that more than paid for the ads.

>> DoubleClick's TestIt! product seems a great idea to me, and they go with
>> 25,000 impression runs per banner. When it comes to knowing how to please
>> advertisers, I'll take Doubleclick over LinkExchange.
>>
>> http://www.doubleclick.net/nf/adinfo/testiset.htm

There are a number of providers who will sell "Test-it!" services
(under different names) to allow testing banners. In most cases, this
is basically a way to sell untargeted impressions at a regular CPM.
To quote from the page you mention, this particular service offers:

2 Banners ---- 50,000 Impressions ---- $38.00 CPM ---- $1,900 total.

In comparison, a ratecard test buy on LinkExchange would be:

2 Banners ---- 200,000 Impressions ---- $10.00 CPM ---- $2,000 total.

It's unclear to me what's more "pleasing" about one service or the
other, although this simplified comparison shows that LinkExchange
offers a great value. I must admit that I haven't used the Test-It!
service, so I will refrain to comment further on the remark about
"knowing how to please advertisers."

In general, one shouldn't place much weight on comparisons like the
one I make above: it's comparing apples and oranges. Different ad
networks provider a different sort of exposure than advertising on
LinkExchange, and there may be reasons why you'd advertise on many, or
just one, or none, depending on your specific goals.

For example, Mr. Dolley, suppose you're helping a manufacturer of
input devices gain exposure on the web. On most ad networks, you can
choose to target a "Technology & the Internet" category, placing your
ad on 5-20 medium to large web sites with relevant subject matter.

On LinkExchange, you could target the "Computer & Internet" category,
with over 18,000 web sites, or you might select "Computer & Internet :
Hardware," placing your ad on several hundred sites. If you prefer to
advertise on a very precise subsection of the LinkExchange network,
you can target the "Computer & Internet : Hardware : Components"
category, with 224 web sites. With over 2,000 categories,
LinkExchange offers multiple levels of targeting in any subject area,
whether travel, finance, entertainment, ... you name it.

The advertising opportunities offered by LinkExchange are totally
different from those offered by other networks, and advertising on
different networks may be quite complementary. You might be best off
spending your budget on a selection of different sites and networks,
to get the maximum brand exposure. It's not unlike traditional media,
where marketing budgets are divided between print, broadcast, direct
mail, etc. LinkExchange often recommends to our advertisers to spread
their ad dollars among different networks or sites to improve their
results, and our advertisers appreciate this sincerity.

Ali Partovi, http://www.linkexchange.com
LinkExchange. The best way to reach people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This week's Online Advertising Discussion List sponsors:

The Internet Advertising Report provides daily columns on every aspect
of Web advertising and marketing. It is updated daily and available in
a weekly newsletter. Subscribe at: http://www.internetnews.com/IAR

--------

NO RISK TRIAL OFFER: Buy 100,000 impressions on Hotmail targeted to
your demographic. If you aren't throughly impressed after 2 weeks, we'll
credit your next buy. Details at http://www.hotmail.com/offer.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Online Advertising Discussion List To Unsubscribe send UNSUBSCRIBE
http://www.o-a.com/ to online-ads-request_at_o-a.com


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Clicksor
List and Found
AdJungle
The Laredo Group

Add your company...

Laredo Group Interactive Advertising Training
AdJungle
List and Found
Clicksor
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.

Visit our other web sites:
Tennis Server | Tennis Server Ticket Exchange | MyCityRocks | MyCityRocks Ticket Exchange