Google
 

NONE: Re: ONLINE-ADS>> WEB-AD'98 COVERAGE: 2/17/98 - TOP TEN MEDIA BUYING

Re: ONLINE-ADS>> WEB-AD'98 COVERAGE: 2/17/98 - TOP TEN MEDIA BUYING

Danny Sullivan (danny_at_calafia.com)
Wed, 18 Feb 1998 16:16:28 +0000

> I was the website marketing expert in the Insituform v. National
> Envirotech case mentioned in the Trademark Trickery article. That
> case was the classic meta-tag trademark infringement case.

With respect to Mark, there is no law banning the use of trademarked
terms in your meta tags. This issue has NOT gone to trial. Of the
three most prominent cases, two were settled (including his) and one
was given a preliminary ruling and not pursued further, to the best
of my knowledge.

None of these cases established a legal precident. Moreover, all
were based around the issue of deception, not just the use of meta
tags. In Mark's case, for example, the company sued was also using
logos and slogan to confuse people who arrived at the site, the case
alleged. In short, there is no "classic" case anyone can use as a
guide. These all remain very unique.

Unfortunately, the press attentionthat Mark happily talked about has
mostly focused on the meta tags use. It has isolated this from what
the sites have done in general. It has also led to the impression
that meta tags are some sort of secret weapon, which they are not.

First and foremost, simply including a term in meta tags is not a
guarantee that a page will to well for that term. The term will need
to be extremely unique, or else someone will have to repeat it so much
that it becomes spamming. I talk about these aspects in depth at:

http://searchenginewatch.com/sereport/9709-oppendahl.htm

Secondly, I could easily argue that because of how search engines
work, it is necessary for me to include trademarked names in my tags.
For example, if I sell Disney movies, I may need to include Disney
trademarked terms in my tags to ensure my customers can discover my
products.

This argument could be extended to competitor terms. If I were Pepsi,
I might argue that people looking for "coke" are doing a generic
search for soft drink information, and I need to include the term coke
to ensure that my site is properly indexed (not that just using the
term would necessarily help, of course).

There are even some more technical arguments I could bring up on why
it might be necessary to include competitor names, which I won't go
into here.

Furthermore, if I were Pepsi, I could simply create a page comparing
Pepsi to Coke, perhaps the results of a survey I conducted. I have
every right to use the word Coke on that page. Furthermore, I would
have every right to use the word Coke in my meta tags in order to
properly classify the page.

The key to all of this is not over the use of a term in a meta tag.
The key is whether a company is being deceptive and trying to fool
people into coming to a site they thought was something else.

If I'm Pepsi, and I rank well for Coke, I'm probably not going to have
any problems unless I ran a description meta tag to say I was Coke or
unless I made my site actually look like Coke.

In closing, you can use trademarked terms if you want to. However,
don't expect that they will necessarily bring you tons of traffic.
Personally, I think this tactic is a waste of time.

Do expect that if you push the terms to some extreme, such as by
spamming, you may invite trouble from search engines and the
lawyers. But if you have a legitimate reason to use them, you should
be safe.

-----------------------------------
Danny Sullivan
Editor, Search Engine Watch
http://searchenginewatch.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This week's Online Advertising Discussion List sponsor:
HotBot - http://www.hotbot.com - The WIRED Search Center

HotBot, rated the #1 search engine by CNET, has keywords available now
in these categories: computers, software, shareware, Internet, games,
music, and more. Contact Rick Boyce at 415.276.8440 or rick_at_wired.com.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Online Advertising Discussion List To Unsubscribe send UNSUBSCRIBE
http://www.o-a.com/ to online-ads-request_at_o-a.com


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Clicksor
List and Found
AdJungle
The Laredo Group

Add your company...

Laredo Group Interactive Advertising Training
AdJungle
List and Found
Clicksor
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.

Visit our other web sites:
Tennis Server | Tennis Server Ticket Exchange | MyCityRocks | MyCityRocks Ticket Exchange