Google
 

NONE: Re: ONLINE-ADS>> Search Engine Optimization = Waste of Time

Re: ONLINE-ADS>> Search Engine Optimization = Waste of Time

Danny Sullivan (danny_at_calafia.com)
Mon, 16 Nov 1998 13:26:56 -0600 (CST)

So I thought I'd wade in along with everyone else :)

RICHARD HOY WROTE:
> First, there's the question: Is search engine optimization worth
> it? I define search engine optimization as the process of
> continously monitoring your ranking in various search engines and
> tweaking your pages and keywords to get a higher ranking.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I would make two definitions here: passive and aggressive
search engine optimization.

Everyone should do passive optimization. This simply means
ensuring that the important terms on your existing pages are
enhanced, to increase the chances you are found. This is
something that many, many web sites neglect. They are losing
out on free traffic because of it.

A smart marketer will build a site with passive optimization
in mind. They'll avoid frames, pay particular care to page
titles and ensure they have lots and lots of quality pages
focusing on particular topics and making use of HTML copy.
The results can be impressive. In short, "If you build it
(right), they will come."

Unfortunately, marketing usually occurs after a site is
built. If you've created a text-light site that is difficult
for a search engine to crawl, you've destroyed the ability
to tap into passive optimization.

Aggressive optimization is when you begin to actively target
terms. It can involve constantly tweaking your pages, making
multiple pages, making custom pages aimed at particular
terms and attempts to cloak the content of those pages from
the search engines.

I'm not a big fan of aggressive optimization. I think, like
Joel stated in his ClickZ article, that aggressive
optization can be a time suck that may not generate the
results expected, especially in contrast to other publicity
methods.

Obviously, some people want to be aggressive. Some people
feel they have to. Some people are even successful with it.
But I think for many people, they will be better off
ensuring they've done a good job with their passive
optimization. The minimal time investment for passive
optimization will more than pay off in related traffic.

RICHARD HOY WROTE:
> Second, there's the question: How many search engines and
> directories should one register in?
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is worthwhile worrying about only the major search
engines, the top 15 or so. After that, I'd satisfy the "more
is better" response many marketers feel by using an
automated tool to cover the other 200 to 600 "search
engines" and spend no more than two hours or so to do this.
You won't see much traffic off of them, if any at all, so
don't waste your time here.

One important note: it is well worth the time to track down
important topical directories related to your site. While
traffic will be less than with the major search engines, it
will be heavily targeted toward the audience you are after.

-----------------------------------
Danny Sullivan
Editor, Search Engine Watch
http://searchenginewatch.com

========================================================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This week's Online Advertising Discussion List sponsors:
The Mining Co. and MarketWave

NOBODY DELIVERS ONLINE BUYERS LIKE THE MINING CO. _at_Plan's Fall Release
says Mining Co. users are more likely to buy online than users of other
navigation sites. To reach them, contact Alan Wragg (awragg_at_miningco.com)

---

Which banner sent more QUALIFIED traffic? The one on Yahoo or Excite?
Hit List can tell you. Click here to find out how.
http://www.marketwave.com/default.htm?AdName=OA3&AdSource=OA

------------------------------------------------------------------------
========================================================================
Online Advertising Discussion List To Unsubscribe send UNSUBSCRIBE
http://www.o-a.com/ to online-ads-request_at_o-a.com


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Clicksor
List and Found
AdJungle
The Laredo Group

Add your company...

Laredo Group Interactive Advertising Training
AdJungle
List and Found
Clicksor
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.

Visit our other web sites:
Tennis Server | Tennis Server Ticket Exchange | MyCityRocks | MyCityRocks Ticket Exchange