Google
 

NONE: Re: ONLINE-ADS>> Industry duck and cover?

Re: ONLINE-ADS>> Industry duck and cover?

Jaffer Ali (jali_at_pulsetv.com)
Tue, 29 Sep 1998 11:36:21 -0500 (CDT)

Hello once again:

I promised myself I wouldn't post again about revenue
sharing models. But since we have joined the ranks of
publishers as well as marketers, I thought I might have some
new found credibility, rather than sounding self
serving...like most publishers and people selling
advertising. We have a daily publication mailed to 100,000
plus people every day.

First there is the oft spoken myth, most curiously offered
by Carol Dawson.

><< Of course they do----wouldn't anyone want a freebie. I'd want cost per
>action too. No commitment, I could send half baked copy (not investing too
>much), and get out whenever I wanted. No skin off my back. The publisher
>absorbs all the risk.>>

Sorry Carol, a cost per action is not "free" unless sales
are not made. A proper revenue sharing deal has a COST per
action, otherwise it would be termed a FREE per action deal.
A well run revenue sharing program means that the publisher
will not accept "half baked copy"... We will run revenue
sharing deals in our UNSOLD inventory. The copy must be good
(in our opinion, which is our RESPONSIBILITY).

When we run a revenue sharing deal inside our publication,
we take responsibility with the advertiser for the message.
If the advertiser wants total control, they can always buy
the space...but we do not run away from our responsibility.

Next, Andy Bourland really indicts the Internet as a direct
marketing medium when he says:

><< I have YET to hear of a SINGLE publisher who made out well on a CPI/CPS
>deal.>>

Why do I say that he indicts the MEDIUM. The advertising
message, whether CPI, CPM, or CP3O could be identical to the
consumer. They do not know if it is a revenue sharing deal.
Advertising either works or does not. I wonder if Andy has
heard of a SINGLE direct marketing campaign that has worked
on the Internet? If the answer is yes, then a proper pay out
could be constructed. If the answer is NO, then the problem
is the medium...which we all SUSPECT is not the case.

All of you publishers and advertising executives out there
who guard unsold inventory as if it was a chaste virgin, get
a life! As for any of you advertisers out there that
believe in letting the market dictate the price of media,
based upon measurable results, drop me a line. We have
100,000 plus daily opt in e-mails going out. If we do not
sell out, we will share revenues with you.

Lastly, owning media as well as selling videos has truly
opened my eyes. Carol, Andy, if OUR media does not work for
OUR advertisers...how can we stay in business? And if the
advertising does work for OUR advertisers, then why
shouldn't WE work out an equitable revenue sharing deal with
UNSOLD inventory.

Instead of trying to uphold the "sanctity" of unsold
inventory, unlock the chastity belt.

Jaffer Ali
www.Laffaday.com
www.PulseTV.com

========================================================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This week's Online Advertising Discussion List sponsors:
AdKnowledge, The Mining Co. and CLIQNOW!/The 24/7 Network

7 out of 15 top agencies know that AdKnowledge improves web advertising
effectiveness. What are YOU waiting for? AdKnowledge. We make web
advertising work. http://ads01.adknowledge.com/SmartBanner/page/9751.2

---

QUESTION: What has 5,000 fingers and has grown 44% since April? It's been
called "a Yahoo! on steroids," and it's spreading fast across the web.
ANSWER: The 500 Expert Guides at http://MiningCo.com

---

CLIQNOW! Networks & The 24/7 Network. Buy reach & powerful brands:
*MoneyNet, UExpress Donnesbury, AT&T WorldNet, MapQuest*
Get these sites on your next buy. http://www.247media.com/umbrella.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------
========================================================================
Online Advertising Discussion List To Unsubscribe send UNSUBSCRIBE
http://www.o-a.com/ to online-ads-request_at_o-a.com


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Local SEO with Video
Houston SEO
Houston Web Design

Add your company...

Local SEO with Video
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.