Google
 

RE: ONLINE ADS>> ClickThrough Rate-Indication of sites quality?

From: Muhammad Lee <lee_at_adgconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:04:21 -0500 (CDT)

KEVIN FRAZIER WROTE:
>Poor content might get a higher clickthrough rate, but that
>does not mean it is adding value to the advertiser. Quality
>content will draw a quality viewer, which usually means the
>site is well organized and easy to navigate. Sites that
>have "sticky", quality content, tend to also offer
>advertisers a more targeted audience.

I only partially agree with the above statement. Mostly
because there are several factors to think about when trying
to figure out what affect a site's content will have on the
click through rate of the ads on the site. Just because a
site has poor content does not mean that it doesn't have a
targeted audience. A site could focus on consumer
information for those interested in purchasing cars, and
could get a tremendous amount of traffic, however because
the site is poorly organized and has few information
resources a banner ad for a car manufacturer could do quite
well. Will the banner get a high click through rate? Yes.
Will the banner attract a targeted audience? Yes. Is it a
direct result of poor content? Yes?

OTOH, a well organized site regarding consumer information
on cars could have the same effect. Someone could browse
through the site and find plenty of information on several
cars and develop a "short list" of the cars he/she is
interested in buying. That person then see's an ad for one
of the car manufacturers on his/her short list and clicks
through because that ad is exactly what that person is
looking for.

In the previous examples, both high and low quality content
had a positive effect on click through ratio. However, the
poor quality site will probably have a higher click through
rate, and the higher quality site will probably have a lower
CTR but deliver more visitors that are ready to buy. So it
would appear that the edge would go to the high quality
site, BUT if the site that was clicked to from the poor
quality site does a good job of SELLING the product the
"less targeted" "less qualified" can be converted into
paying customers anyway.

What does all this mean? Nothing really. While you can
establish general rules of content vs. CTR, media planners
should evaluate the dynamics of the web site and determine
the affect the content will have on the CTR and conversion
rate before placing ads on that site.


In some cases you may want poor content, in some cases you
may want high quality, somewhere in between, etc. However,
to make blanket statements that a high quality site or a
poor quality site is the best solution is a bad idea IMO.
I've sold advertising for a client on site that has no
CONTENT, that's right NO content. Just ads, nothing but ads.
However the ads get a high CTR, the advertisers are getting
good results and everyone is happy. Now is this site the
best place for everyone to advertise? No, but for some
advertisers it is. (BTW, my client has almost no inventory
available at the moment, how many publishers can say that?!)
It's just a question of effective media planning, placing
your ads where they can be effective.

Best Regards,


Muhammad Lee
President/CEO
Advanced Design Group, LLC
"Web Development Specialists"
http://www.adgconsulting.com

========================================================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        This week's Online Advertising Discussion List sponsors:
                   StreamMedia, Flycast, and GoTo

              Evolve, she said. RADICALMAIL.COM
  Streaming multimedia email that puts your advertising back
    on top of the food chain. http://www.radicalmail.com/

                                        ---
 
 WEB ADVERTISING THAT MAKES YOU A HERO. Our Web experts optimize your
buy across 1000 sites. All for what you'd normally pay for placement on
   one. Call it superhuman. http://WWW.FLYCAST.COM/OA

                                        ---

        TARGETED, PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE ADVERTISING - GoTo.com
Get listed today. Reach, targeting, control, speed - all risk-free!
   http://www.goto.com/d/advertisers/p/generic/?o=37&Promo=e_OA

------------------------------------------------------------------------
========================================================================
Received on Fri Jul 23 1999 - 11:25:27 CDT


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Clicksor
Local SEO with Video
Houston SEO
AdJungle
Houston Web Design
The Laredo Group
Online Advertising Network

Add your company...

FreeKii Ads Online Advertising
Laredo Group Interactive Advertising Training
AdJungle
Local SEO with Video
Clicksor
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.

Visit our other web sites:
Tennis Server | Tennis Server Ticket Exchange | MyCityRocks | MyCityRocks Ticket Exchange