Google
 

Re: legitimate unsolicited commercial e-mail vs spam

From: Bob Fertik <bob_at_i-progress.com>
Date: Sat 30 Oct 1999 11:03:04 -0400

DAVID ROSS WROTE:
> I am writing a paper taking the position that legitimate
> unsolicited commercial e-mail (e.g. business to business, or
> directed at website owners, complying with proposed/actual
> federal and/or state legislation, with easy removal from
> mailing list, etc) should be distinguished from "bad" spam
> (e.g. fake return addresses, pyramid plans, pornography,
> etc.), and should be permitted (if not actually encouraged).

Dear David,

I don't flame people as a matter of principle, but I will
make an exception in your case.

To wit: You are a moron.

Speaking as a marketing professional, there is no such thing
as "legitimate unsolicited commercial e-mail".

In other words, there is legimate opt-in e-mail, and there
is spam. There is no grey area in between.

Please do not try to create any, because you are obviously
too uniformed and ideologically blinded to do so
intelligently.

My email box is my private property. It is not the property
of the US Postal Service, like my snail mail box. I pay for
it and I own it. I alone decide who is allowed to deposit
material in it. If a marketer thinks he has the right to
violate my property, I will make him pay, either directly
(having his ISP service terminated) or by destroying his
reputation and brand equity.

Your legal and technical parameters are meaningless.

> business to business

My e-mail box serves both my business and personal
activities. There is no meaningful category of "business to
business".

> directed at website owners,

Why does creating a personal home page make one a legitimate
target for spam?

> complying with proposed/actual federal and/or state
> legislation,

Are you really a law student, or a grade schooler in
disguise? Have you not learned the difference between a
bill and a law? Most of the spam I receive claims to be in
compliance with a bill, not a law. What a farce! If your
law school has not taught you the difference, it should be
closed immediately.

Do everyone a favor and find some other area of law to screw
up.

Bob Fertik, Editor
i-Progress Report
Internet Advertising, Marketing, and Fundraising
www.i-progress.com/report
editor_at_i-progress.com
PO Box 20594, New York NY 10021
(917) 677-2540




Received on Sat Oct 30 1999 - 10:03:04 CDT


HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST

With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List.

 


Online Advertising Industry Leaders:

Clicksor
Local SEO with Video
AdJungle
Houston Web Design
The Laredo Group
Pay As You Go Advertising

Add your company...

FreeKii Ads Online Advertising
Laredo Group Interactive Advertising Training
AdJungle
Local SEO with Video
Clicksor
 



 


 
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2003 - Present
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 2001 - 2002
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1999 - 2000
Online Advertising Discussion List Archives: 1996 - 1998

Online Advertising Home | Guidelines | Conferences | Testimonials | Contact Us | Sponsorship | Resources
Site Access and Use Policy | Privacy Policy

 
2323 Clear Lake City Blvd., Suite 180-139, Houston, TX 77062-8120
Phone: 281-480-6300
 
Copyright 1996-2007 The Online Advertising Discussion List, a division of ADASTRO Incorporated.
All Rights Reserved.

Visit our other web sites:
Tennis Server | Tennis Server Ticket Exchange | MyCityRocks | MyCityRocks Ticket Exchange