 |
|
The Online Advertising Discussion List Archives
[Online-Ads Home Page]
[Current Discussion]
[Archives]
[Search Online Ads]
====================================================================
Online Advertising Discussion List
====================================================================
List Moderator: Supported by:
Kevin Fadden InterEdge
kfad_at_interedge.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
April 16, 1996 Digest#0018
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
********************************************************************
This week's sponsor:
InterEdge
For more information on this fertile advertising ground, check out
our rate card at:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[THIS SPACE FOR RENT]
For information on sponsoring Online-Ads, see:
********************************************************************
In this Digest...
NEW
-------
"Moderator Comments"
~ Kevin Fadden
"Digital Stater Feedback"
~ PJ Hruschak
CONTINUING
-------
"Re: Online-Ads Update"
~ Bob Novick
~ Hank Heath
~ Bill Gallagher
"Meta tags"
~ Joe McWilliams
~ Christopher Bain
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION
-------
"Needing Statistics"
~ PJ Hruschak
BANNER SWAP MEET
-------
Look here for a *short* listing of sites that are looking to swap ad
banners with each other, you, and everyone else.
*****************
NEW
*****************
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kevin Fadden
Subject: Moderator Comments
Howdy folks! Well, we *do* have a digest today. I'd like to first of all
thank those of you who have responded to my request for feedback as to
why traffic had died down so much in recent days. For the benefit of the
group, I have included many of the postings in this digest. I will be
ammending my own comments to some of these posts, which are down in the
"Continuing" section.
I think one big reason that *I* did not think of was that this past
weekend was Tax Weekend for those of us here in the States. So, my
apologies (and sympathies; condolences, if applicable) to anyone who was
stuck doing their taxes this weekend.
I would also like to briefly apologize to the group for my lambasting of
the online ad rep agencies and networks, whom I may have offended with my
remarks. Sometimes, not just here, but in everyday life, as well, I feel
like putting on the coach's cap and whistle. I would liken my message to
the list yesterday to a half-time locker room speech. If nothing else,
this was the spirit in which it was intended.
Sometimes I think we all tend to forget just how tricky of a beast email
is -- once you hit "send", it's gone and you can't take it back. I'm not
trying to do that, but I would like to own up to having had a momentary
let-down in this regard.
NOW, onto brighter and lighter topics. We can welcome about 40 new
subscribers to our group (now at 521, we have had some people leave). For
their benefit, I'd like to point out a few things:
1) Frequently Asked Questions:
2) Archived Digests are avialable as a link off the FAQ page.
3) The list is available for Sponsorship. Details for this are also
available on the FAQ page.
4) IF any of our newer subscribers are online ad buyers, please contact
me directly at . I do have something to offer
you, and also, as I believe this constituency makes up the *smallest*
percentage of our group, I'd be curious to know just how many of you are
out there. (this goes for existing subscribers, as well.) I assure you,
you're disclosure will be kept confidential.
Enjoy the digest and keep those posts coming,
Kevin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: phruscha_at_arcrs1.saed.kent.edu (PJ Hruschak)
Subject: Digital Stater Feedback
I am a journalism graduate student at Kent State. For my masters project
I
created an online (Web) version of the student newspaper at Kent, The
Daily
Kent Stater..."The Digital Kent Stater"
(http://www.saed.kent.edu/Stater/).
For my project I need people to critique/comment on the site.
I know there are a few bugs, but suggestions, comments, criticisms and
praises are needed for my final project paper. If you would please look
at
the site and email comments to me (phruscha_at_saed.kent.edu).
This is not an attempt to get an increase in traffic...although we
(myself,
the grad assistant, and the ads manager) are having problems setting
advertising rates since this is a college site and very few colelge sites
actually sell online ad "space." We've had several offers from companies
who want to purchase onlinea d space, but we've been waiting to get a
better sense of what to charge (we have some pro. figures from magazines
and from some of my research...hopefully with info. from people on this
listserv...hint, hint...see my last posting...)
PJ Hruschak
EMAIL: phruscha_at_saed.kent.edu
Digital Kent Stater
WWW: http://www.saed.kent.edu/Stater/
OFFICE: (330) 672-3250
--------------------------------------------------------------------
*****************
CONTINUING
*****************
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bob Novick
Subject: Re: Online-Ads Update
Speaking for myself, I hate the digest-only format. When I'm very busy,
as I have been the past couple of weeks, I find it too much trouble to
read the digests, though I scan all the non-digest articles of the
Internet-Marketing list.
Bob Novick
Impulse Research
*** Moderator: I would welcome the feedback of the group on this
particular point. Personally, because *I too* am *extremely* busy, I only
subscribe to digest versions of the lists to which I belong. As they
trickle in throughout the day, I simply open them up and save them. Then,
when I do have the time to invest, usually toward the end of my day, I
read them. For me, this ensures that I'm in the right frame of mind to
read, learn, investigate and/or respond to anything pertinent I may find.
Now, as I mentioned, I would be curious to know just how many people in
the group would prefer to have the list in single message format.
However, this will basically do away with the "moderation" of the group.
(Not that that would necessarily be a bad thing, but....) Also, there is
a technical consideration: My mail server and my Web server are the same
machine. This is primarily why I send the digests out late at night --
when my Web server isn't so busy. I would love to have these two servers
on dedicated machines, however, financial considerations make that
impossible at the present. (Yes, this is a hint for sponsorships 8-). So,
for posterity's sake, I'd like to know how many peole would be interested
in this, but I can make no gaurantees that it will happen, even *if*
there is an overwhelming majority in favor of it. I will most definitely
keep it in mind for the future, though, as hopefully I'll be adding
machines right and left before too long. Sorry, Bob.
-- KF ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: HankHeath_at_aol.com
that the response has gone down. I think your list has
been really cooking. My personal excuse for not contributing is - well -
I
been busy, boss. But do not take it as a sign of disinterest.
Hank Heath
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bill Gallagher
Subject: Re: Online-Ads Update
Feedback. . . .
The sales, marketing and ad lists seem to wander on topic and are often a
little "marketing newbie." My impression is that there are way too many
tech types and too few marketing/advertising/selling types posting.
For sure there needs to be both types of readers/posters but it's a
little lite on the traditional ad and media perspective. It seems like so
many are learning what a CPM is for the first time and that makes it less
involving for others.
Bill Gallagher, Bill_at_ipub.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| iPUB (sm) interactive publishing | publishers of:
|
----------------------------------|-------------------------------------
|
| http://www.ipub.com/ipub | Guerrilla Marketing Online Magazine
|
| 1519 Mountain Boulevard | http://www.gmarketing.com
|
| Oakland, CA 94611 |
|
| 510/658-xxxx Fax:510/658-xxxx |
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
temporary phone 510/658-9685
*** Moderator: I think Bill raises a good point here. We've had more talk
about Meta Tags than about advertising. Nobody can twist anybody's arm
into posting, but we all, I think, would like to see a bit more from
those people who are actually selling the ads. And what of ad buyers?
Could you folks please clue us all in to what it is you are looking for
and/or expect from a site or sites you'd consider advertising on?
-- KF ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jmcwill_at_hoovers.com (Joe McWilliams)
Subject: More on Meta tags
Thanks for your help with the meta tags. Our test was a success.
However, I'm most concerned if I use these tags my click through rate
will
plummet.
Who else is using these tags to record impressions? Is this a standard?
Thanks again for your valued advice.
Joe McWilliams
**************************************************
Joe McWilliams, Advertising Manager
The Reference Press
6448 Highway 290 E-104
Austin, TX 78723
(512) 454-7778 (voice)
(512) 454-9401 (fax)
Come check out Hoover's Online (http://www.hoovers.com)
The ultimate source for company information.
**************************************************
*** Moderator: I do just want to clarify one thing on these meta tags:
While it is a nice (?) benefit that this tag does increase your hit
counts (barely -- it actually gives you a truer representation of how
many times each pages is really "hit", IMHO), the primary purpose of this
particular tag is to prevent proxy servers, such as AOL's, from serving
outdated files to users who can't tell the difference. I've heard of
people receiving mailto: forms that were replaced or modified two-three
months ago. This is a big problem, until you start using these tags, that
is. (Refer to DIGEST #0017 for details)
-- KF ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Christopher Bain <70242.661_at_CompuServe.COM>
Subject: more META info
I received many replies after my recent posting explaining some META tag
basics,
so in light of the interest, I thought I would share some info that
recently
came my way from one of the premier search engines, InfoSeek
. It has some important implications as far as
their
own indexing system goes, and may well be useful for the
dozens.scores.hundreds
of other search services out there (if any other search engine folks are
listening, and want to share this type of tidbit, or correct any of this
post,
please feel free).
By default, InfoSeek uses the first 250 characters from your Web page for
the
description that appears in their search results. The usefulness of this
information alone is evident with almost any basic search you might
try......many sites give you no substantial information about the site,
very
little description (if any), and/or no enticement to "Pick Me!".
Since most
searches yield hundreds or thousands of hits, the searcher makes a quick
decision as to which sites most closely match his/her search criteria.
So make
those first 250 words count. I wrote to them asking what happens when
your
entire home page is an image map, or series of graphics, but haven't
heard back
from them yet. I'll report back when I hear.
If you don't want to use the first 250 characters as the description, you
can
specify a different description by including the META tag in the
element of your page (which I described in my earlier post, and covered
elsewhere in print and on the web. This is where the META
Name="description"
Content="your description goes here"> part comes in. Same goes for
META Name="keywords" Content="your keywords go here"
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the importance of
carefully
wording both the META tags AND the first 250 characters of your home
page. If
you routinely submit information about multiple pages to the search
engines (a
time consuming task I'll admit) then you'd have to do this for each
page/subject
area. For instance, since our site currently features our line of 38
different
thematic music books packaged with audio CDs, I'm currently submitting
several
of the more popular titles to the search engines. This way, someone
searching
for Big Bands, or Mozart, or Dixieland, or The Blues, or Women of
Country, or
Hollywood Musicals, etc. stand a better chance of finding our specific
pages,
regardless of how the resulting information is displayed or how the
search is
performed. Since the various search engines also weight their searches
differently, it may also help weight our pages more heavily so that they
end up
higher on the resulting search list.
InfoSeek adds: Note to sites using frames: If your site uses Netscape
frames
and if the site's main HTML file (the file with the
[Online-Ads Home Page]
[Current Discussion]
[Archives]
[Search Online Ads]
HOW TO JOIN THE ONLINE ADVERTISING DISCUSSION LIST
|
With an archive of more than 14,000 postings, since 1996 the
Online Advertising Discussion List has been the Internet's leading forum focused on professional discussion
of online advertising and online media buying and selling strategies, results, studies, tools, and media
coverage. If you wish to join the discussion list, please use this link to sign up on the home page of the Online Advertising Discussion List. |
|
|
Online Advertising Industry Leaders:
Clicksor
List and Found
AdJungle
The Laredo Group
Add your company...




|